Friday 11 January 2013

Nokia sells 4.4 million Lumias in Q4, gives positive outlook


Nokia sells 4.4 million Lumias in Q4, gives positive outlook


Nokia has published preliminary financial results for the period of Q4, 2012 and have declared them to be better than expected.
The Finnish smartphone manufacturer has estimated shipments of its range of Lumia smartphones to have crossed 4.4 million units. It also shipped 9.3 million units of its Asha range of feature phones. Of the 86.2 million units that Nokia shipped this quarter about 6.6 million are smartphones. 
“We are pleased that Q4 2012 was a solid quarter where we exceeded expectations and delivered underlying profitability in Devices & Services and record underlying profitability in Nokia Siemens Networks. We focused on our priorities and as a result we sold a total of 14 million Asha smartphones and Lumia smartphones while managing our costs efficiently, and Nokia Siemens Networks delivered yet another very good quarter,” said CEO Stephen Elop.
 Overall the numbers are a healthy improvement  over the 2.9 million Lumia phones that Nokia shipped during the third quarter. What may surprise you is that Symbian phones still account for 2.2 million device shipments. Full results for Q4 2012 will be available on January 24th.

Cheap smartphones global market grows


Cheap smartphones global market grows


Nokia AshaNokia sold 9.3 million units of its Asha handset

Related Stories

Asha, the budget smartphone line from Nokia, is outselling its premium handset offering, the Windows-run Lumia, by over two to one.
The firm's quarterly results, published on Thursday, revealed the total number of both Asha and Lumia devices sold in the last three months of 2012 was 14 million. Only 4.4 million were Lumias.
There have also been rumours that Apple may offer a lower-priced iPhone model.
Reports that a senior Apple executive denied this have been withdrawn.
"We forecast that by 2016, 31% of the global overall handset market will be low-end smartphone," Ian Fogg, principal analyst at IHS, told the BBC.
"An entry-level smartphone is very different from a high-end smartphone," he said.
"Smaller, cheaper devices have processors from two or three years ago, they have small screens with low resolution, and weaker cameras. They can all do email and the web but gaming and browsing is a much better experience on the higher end phones."
However the difference in cost to the consumer is significant - in the UK a basic smartphone can cost as little as £29.99), he said, while the iPhone 5 currently retails for £529 on the Apple UK website.
Premium phones
"Apple still play out at the premium end of the market," said Mr Fogg.
"Can they remain profitable and successful being in a small part of the handset market or do they need to be a bigger player to get the economies of scale right?"
According to analysts ComScore, by the end of 2012 only 28% of smartphone owners in the UK had iPhone handsets.
"Apple makes high quality products, it doesn't make cheap products," Mr Fogg added.
iPhone 5The iPhone 5 retails for £529 in the UK
"That doesn't rule out Apple creating a cheaper iPhone that still has high quality components. Look at the iPod range - they started with a premium price product, then they added the mini, the nano, the shuffle - they went to a range of products hitting different price points."
Mr Fogg pointed out that there are currently variations of the iPhone 4, 4S and 5 available at different prices.
"Their strategy has been to reuse previous generation model rather than build a new model," he said.
"Apple, I'm sure, is evaluating that strategy. Is it better to use a tried and trusted design that they know how to manufacture and that the consumer understands, or is it better to design a new model that hits that price point?"
At the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas this month, Chinese phone manufacturer ZTE announced plans to launch a lower-end smartphone running on Mozilla's Firefox operating software in Europe this year.
"I think Apple should be more aggressive with its smartphone range," said Mr Fogg.
"I think the strategy they have had of reusing previous year's models has been quite smart, but there is also an opportunity to design a new product that hits that low price point."

More on This Story

Obama: U.S. Forces To Take A Step Back In Afghanistan

Obama: U.S. Forces To Take A Step Back 

In Afghanistan
Afghan President Hamid Karzai and President Obama during Friday's news conference at the White House.
Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA /LANDOV
American and coalition forces will move into a "support" role in Afghanistan starting this spring, President Obama announced Friday afternoon at the White House during a joint news conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
Obama said Afghan soldiers "are stepping up" and U.S. forces can now step back.
American troops will still be available for combat missions if needed, the president said. But the news marks a shift in the description of the role U.S. forces will play in Afghanistan this year. Before today, the administration's focus had been on the withdrawal of "combat" forces by the end of 2014.
There are about 66,000 U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan, where American forces toppled the Taliban in November 2001.
We live blogged during the news conference.
Update at 2:17 p.m. ET. In Conclusion, Obama Speaks Of The Future For Afghan Women:
Asked whether Afghan women should be worried about what will happen to them, President Obama speaks of the new Afghan constitution that pledges to respect women's rights and says it would be a mistake for that nation not to tap the talents of its women.
Update at 2:10 p.m. ET. Afghanistan's Fortunes Are Brighter, Obama Says:
"Afghanistan still has work to do," says Obama, "but there's no doubt that the possibility of peace and prosperity in Afghanistan today is higher than before we went in." And, he says, the U.S. has "achieved our central goal ... or have come very close." That is, "to decapitate al-Qaida ... to dismantle it."
Update at 2:07 p.m. ET. Like Turkey Or Germany?
Karzai says the U.S. presence in Afghanistan in coming years may resemble its presences in "Turkey or Germany" — two NATO allies.
Update at 2:05 p.m. ET. "Very Different Mission":
Obama calls the shift in the spring "a very different mission and a very different task and a very different footprint" for U.S. and coalition forces.
Update at 1:57 p.m. ET. Not Clear Yet Whether Withdrawal Will Be Accelerated:
Whether the earlier-than-anticipated transition of U.S. forces to a "support" role means U.S. forces will be able to withdraw sooner, Obama says, is "something that isn't yet fully determined." He says commanders are developing recommendations for him on that point. The plan has been for all U.S. "combat" forces to be out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014.
Update at 1:50 p.m. ET. Afghan Forces Will Be "Fully Responsible" For Security This Spring:
"In the spring this year, the Afghan forces will be fully responsible for providing security and protection to the Afghan people," Karzai says in his opening comments.
He also says the presidents have agreed that Taliban officials should be allowed to open an office in Qatar. That's another sign the leaders are trying to bring some elements of the Taliban into discussions about Afghanistan's future.
Update at 1:44 p.m. ET. Obama Says U.S. Mission Will Turn To Support This Spring:
Saying it twice to emphasize the point, Obama says he and Karzai have agreed that "coalition forces will move to a support role this spring. ... Starting this spring, our troops will have a different mission."
They will be available, he says, to support combat missions if needed.
Update at 1:42 p.m. ET. News Conference Has Begun:
The two presidents are at the microphones. In his opening remarks, Obama hails the sacrifices of American forces and the Afghan people, and says that in 2014, "this war will come to a responsible end."
Update at 1:10 p.m. ET. Joint Statement:
The White House just released a joint statement from the leaders. It does not specifically address U.S. troop levels. Here's the relevant section:
"During their meetings, the Presidents welcomed recent improvements in Afghanistan's security environment. The Leaders welcomed Afghan security forces' increasing assumption of lead responsibility, noting the marked progress made in the growth and capabilities of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF). Exceeding initial expectations, Afghan forces began leading the majority of operations in July 2012 and now lead approximately 80% of operations. In February, in conjunction with the fourth tranche of transition, the ANSF is expected to have the lead in securing nearly 90% of the Afghan population.
"Consistent with Afghan priorities, Leaders at the Chicago Summit committed to mark a milestone in mid-2013 when the ISAF mission would shift from combat to support. President Obama welcomed President Karzai's desire to mark this milestone this spring, when the ANSF are expected to assume the operational lead across Afghanistan, and ISAF will move into an advisor-support role. This milestone would coincide with announcing the fifth and final tranche of transition, which would commence implementation in the summer, subject to final NATO and Afghan approval.
"At the time of the milestone, most unilateral U.S. combat operations should end, with U.S. forces pulling back their patrols from Afghan villages. Both Leaders recognized that, as the Afghan security forces take greater responsibility for security, improving the quality of the ANSF, including the accelerated provision of appropriate equipment and enablers, remains a key priority.
"Building upon significant progress in 2012 to transfer responsibility for detentions to the Afghan Government, the Presidents committed to placing Afghan detainees under the sovereignty and control of Afghanistan, while also ensuring that dangerous fighters remain off the battlefield. President Obama reaffirmed that the United States continues to provide assistance to the Afghan detention system. The two Presidents also reaffirmed their mutual commitment to the lawful and humane treatment of detainees, and their intention to ensure proper security arrangements for the protection of Afghan, U.S., and coalition forces."
Our original post:
The issue many Americans will want to hear about this afternoon when President Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai take questions from reporters at the White House is how many U.S. military personnel will be staying in Afghanistan after 2014, when the U.S. combat mission there is set to officially end.
"U.S. commanders in Afghanistan have proposed keeping 6,000 to 15,000 U.S. troops after 2014 to continuing pursuing terrorists and training Afghan security forces. But the White House, which tends to favor lower troop levels than the generals do, says Obama would be open to pulling all U.S. forces out of Afghanistan at the end of 2014."
NPR Pentagon correspondent Tom Bowman put it this way Thursday: American military officials think around 6,000 U.S. troops will remain in Afghanistan after 2014, but White House officials are "looking to keep the numbers lower than the generals." One important factor: the high cost of operations — more than $600 billion in the past decade and $100 billion this year alone — in Afghanistan.
The two leaders' news conference is being streamed by the White House. We're updating this post with highlights. Later today, NPR's Jackie Northam is due to have more on the Obama-Karzai meeting during All Things ConsideredClick here to find an NPR station that broadcasts or streams the show.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai smiled as President Obama gestured earlier today in the Oval Office.

OSCAR NOMINATIONS 2013...

OSCAR NOMINATIONS 2013...

Rajev Paul evicted from Bigg Boss 6

Rajev Paul evicted from Bigg Boss 6

Rajev Paul
After Delnaaz Irani, it is her ex-husband Rajev Paul, who has been voted out from the sixth season of controversial reality show Bigg Boss.

The actor had to bid adieu to the show just a day before the grand finale, to be held Saturday. He was escorted out of the Bigg Boss house by superstar host Salman Khan.

Rajev has been part of the show since it went on air in Oct last year. He had shared a cordial relationship with all the inmates of the house, except from celebrity image consultant Imam Siddique. The two of them were often seen getting involved in verbal spats.

Rajev's closeness to model Sana Khan in the show also set the tongues wagging, though both of them always maintained that they are good friends.

With Rajev out of the Bigg Boss 6 winner's race, the contestants competing for the winner's trophy are Sana, Imam, Niketan Madhok and Urvashi Dholakia.

The winner will walk away with Rs.50 lakh cash prize. The grand finale will be aired Saturday on Colors.

India outwitted by Pak strategy to internationalise Kashmir and escape the rap for the killing of two soldiers


India outwitted by Pak strategy to internationalise Kashmir and escape the rap for the killing of two soldiers


Mounting a diplomatic offensive, Pakistan's foreign secretary Jalil Abbas Jilani on Friday briefed European envoys on the situation along the Line of Control (LoC).

He also met US Ambassador Richard Olson to discuss the issue. Jilani contended that the envoys of the US and European countries were concerned about the situation along the LoC. "I'm sure they will play a positive role in de-escalating the current situation," he said upping the ante.

Scoring a diplomatic point, he asked India "to thoroughly investigate the repeated violations of the ceasefire along the LoC by Indian troops", and renewed the offer to hold an independent inquiry into recent ceasefire violations through the United Nations Military Observers Group for India and Pakistan(UNMOGIP).

This was countered by the MEA, which reiterated India's position that it was capable of resolving the issue bilaterally and again rejected the role of any third party.

In denial, Jilani had summoned the Indian High Commissioner Sharat Sabharwal to the foreign office and lodged a "strong protest on the repeated, unacceptable and unprovoked attacks on Pakistani soldiers by the Indian Army".

In contrast to India's summoning of its envoy on Wednesday, this was the second time the Indian diplomat was summoned, twice within a week to build pressure on India. Earlier this week India's deputy high commissioner Gopal Bagley was summoned and served a demarche.

The Pakistani foreign secretary asked India to "thoroughly investigate the repeated violations of the ceasefire along the Line of Control (LoC) by Indian troops", reiterating the offer to hold an independent inquiry through the UNMOGIP.

This is not the first time that Islamabad has out-manoeuvered New Delhi to put the tag of aggressor on India while playing the victim.

"Look at the whole history of our reaction to Pakistan, the joint terror mechanism, the Sharm El Sheikh declaration we have been finding excuses for Pakistan, that things are going well. What have we got from them be it on the 26/11 attacks? Pakistan is trying to provoke India and they want to internationalise the issue because they are the president of the UN Security Council and the army wants to get to centre stage of the Pakistani politics," said former secretary MEA, Rajiv Sikri.

It was deja vu on January 11 when, as the sense of outrage over the brutality was building up in South Block, foreign secretary Ranjan Mathai's advice to his officials in the Pakistan division of foreign office was that diplomats don't do things with passion but have to give a calm response and not escalate matters.

Perhaps an advice he learnt in the good old school of diplomacy. But when the adversary on the other side is a slippery state like Pakistan, often a calm response is mistaken as weakness. And that is how India's weak-kneed diplomatic response to the brutal killing of its two soldiers is being seen.

Sources said that the attempt was to ensure that the crisis did not spiral out of control. That's the reason the Prime Minister's Office that largely runs the Pakistan policy stepped in with a restraining order. But with Pakistan quick with its denials and posturing in front of the cameras India was left with a lame diplomatic response.

Even the External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid seemed out of sync with what the correct diplomatic response should have been.

"I think the  External Affairs Minister's statement where he said that we are waiting for an appropriate response from Pakistan, what response will they give except to deny it, was like that of an amateur. The minister is the foreign office and he needs to reflect on what he said," commented Vivek Katju, a former secretary in the Ministry of External Affairs who also headed the Foreign Office's Pakistan desk during the Agra Summit.

Said former Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal, "We have not taken any concrete step besides calling in their high commissioner. They have stopped LoC trade, this shows our weakness and our inability to convey to Pakistan there will be cost attached if they do such a provocative act."

"They know that Indian choices are limited and therefore they can get away with this. they want to build the morale of the Pakistani army by showing that India can be helpless in these situations," Sibal added.